I would recommend it for anyone who is getting divorced in Texas or preparing for the possibility of divorce.  If you are interested in being on the call just visit the teleseminar registration page for details.

Give Me My Kidney!

A Long Island surgeon, Dr. Richard Batista, is seeking the return of his donated kidney from his wife in the property division of his ongoing divorce case.  Alternatively, he is willing to allow her to keep the kidney in exchange for $1.5 million.

Apparently, the valuation was derived based on what a black market kidney would sell for.  However, such sales are illegal in the U.S.

The article goes on to explain that Dr. Batista is extremely hurt and upset by his wife’s extra marital affairs which occurred some time after the kidney transplant.

Generally speaking, a kidney (donated or otherwise) would not be a marital asset subject to division.  But it will be interesting to see how the New York divorce court handles the case.

If their name is familiar it might be because they have donated a lot of money to the University of Houston where they met. In 1991 they gave over $50 million to the school.

Their situation is really not unlike that of a lot of couples who own a business that makes up the vast majority of their overall estate. The dilemma is how to equitably divide an estate when it is predominantly made up of a single asset that is nearly impossible to divide. One possibility is for each party to be awarded a share of the business, although the idea of ex’s being business partners post-divorce is not an ideal situation either.

It is one thing to have an estate that is made up primarily of a 401(k) or a brokerage account. Those kinds of assets are relatively easy to divide, especially non-retirement accounts. But things get sticky when the primary asset is something really illiquid, like a business. In that scenario, if one party is very involved in the business and the other side is not, it is often a foregone conclusion who it should be awarded to. Then the issue becomes accurately valuing the business and determining how the other party will be compensated for their share.

Sometimes the only practical solution is to sell the business and liquidate the value so that it can be divided. Probably the Moores, both of whom are supposedly very involved with the day to day operations of the Padres, are trying to avoid this result (they have already publicly stated that they won’t sell).

Hopefully they can work out a solution that is acceptable to both of them. Regardless, the franchise has an estimated value of $385 million, so we shouldn’t feel too sorry for them.