Alimony – Should Fault Be Considered?
There was a bit of a stir in the media this week when a Utah lawmaker proposed a bill that would give family court judges the authority to consider fault when deciding the issue of alimony in a divorce case. The news reports I have seen are unclear on whether this bill would modify the law to make it permissible for a judge to award alimony solely upon a finding of adultery by the payor spouse, or if it would simply allow the judge who has determined that a spouse is eligible to receive alimony to factor in the bad conduct in determining the amount and duration of the alimony award.
Fault Already a Factor Under Texas Alimony Statute
The law in Texas is already similar to the latter. Under Texas Family Code Section 8.052 a court that has determined that a spouse is eligible to receive spousal maintenance (the term the Texas Family Code uses for alimony) may consider a number of relevant factors including marital misconduct of either party, such as adultery. In other words the Texas statute already gives the judge authority to make an alimony award larger because of the adultery of the payor spouse or to make the award smaller because of the adultery of the recipient spouse.
Critics of these types of provisions argue that it encourages more contentious divorce litigation. They say these kinds of provisions force the lawyers to dig deeper and looking for fault and in particular affairs. Additionally, they argue that the primary purpose of alimony should be remedial. That is to help a spouse get on their feet financially during the transition after the marriage has ended.
What are Your Thoughts?
What do you think? Should a spouse who has committed adultery receive less alimony? What about a spouse who cheated and is now going to pay alimony, should that person have to pay more as a result of their bad behavior? Please comment below and let me know your thoughts are it
Related Posts
Alimony Post on our Austin Divorce Blog
Texas Alimony Not So Bad After All
Latest posts by Scott Morgan (see all)
- Five Benefits of Retaining a Lawyer in a “Quickie Divorce” - May 13, 2013
- Guest Post – What to do During a Traffic Stop - May 6, 2013
- Guest Post on License Suspension for Failure to Pay Child Support - May 2, 2013

I am hoping the decision to award alimony/vs no alimony can be a no brainer in some cases..This is a scenario that I concocted from my imagination, God help anybody that actually has to go through this !
Take the example of the husband who was employed off and on during the marriage. This couple was married 35 years, both are in their mid to late fifties.. According to the husband. his construction trade never provided security. Husband was frequently unemployed. Husband never accumulated savings or retirement funds. The wife had the secure job and was the major breadwinner (economically) in this household..While the wife worked and the husband was unemployed, the husband participated in Boy Scouts with the children as was active in many of their other school activities..The husband cooked the meals but he was not much of an equal partner in doing other household chores..The wife was okay with this arrangement during the years that their kids were younger, living at home, and in school..Wife had many frustrations with quality of the marriage but never considered divorce..
Fast forward to kids being out of college and on their own..Something seems off key with the husband’s behavior and in the marriage in general according to the wife..Wife eventually finds out that the husband has had an LTA(long term affair) and had been looking for sex hookups daily on Craig’s List for several years…She confronted him, they go to marriage counseling….The husband was not remorseful and assigned blame to wife and the marriage for his misbehavior…He didn’t end the affair…Eventually wife decided that she was going to throw in the towel and not work on the marriage anymore..She knew that in the case of divorce, she wanted to move out of state and be with her family.. The wife knew that she was eligible for early retirement from her longtime job with one company..She decided that she was going to postpone filing for divorce until after she retired and had secured a place to live (out of town) close to her family.. She also wanted to line up new job prospects in the town that she wanted to live in..She wanted to have all of this in place before she filed and had her husband served. All of these thoughts were swirling around in her mind for weeks and months..One day wife received and had to sign for a certified letter in the mail..After opening the certified letter the wife was surprised but not so shocked…The certified letter stated that the husband had to go to his community’s police department ASAP and sign up to be on the sex offender registry..
At this point in time the husband was unemployed, and had no intentions of finding another job, he knew that his wife was done with the marriage and wanted a divorce..House in both husband’s/wife’s name and paid for, but the appraised value of the home amounted to being nowhere near that of the wife’s pension..The wife was hesitant on how to proceed, or file, she had a wall of fear in front of her.. She was deathly afraid she wouldn’t have enough to live on at this later stage in life should the husband get awarded half of her pension and also alimony..She felt she wouldn’t have a lot of time to recover well financially because she had significant health problems that limited her from going back to work full time..
I would hope and think that this scenario would be a no brainer when it comes to finding fault for marital misbehavior and making the decision of how to divide assets if the outcome of the case had to be decided on by the judge…I definitely do think that the cheating spouse should not receive alimony and age and health of the working (non cheating) spouse should be taken into consideration when it comes the decision of whether or not to divide pension earnings…
Hi Lisa, I’m not sure if the facts you described in your comment were hypothetical or not, but those are definitely facts (especially the part about him being a registered sex offender) that would make a court less inclined to award alimony. Of course in more typical cases without such aggravated facts the primary considerations that the court will look at are the economics and future financial prospects for each of the parties.